This exercise examines the effect the focal length of the lens has on the photograph taken with it. To do this I have photographed the same subject with my widest and longest lenses. This exercise is slightly out of sequence as I managed to grab these shots earlier in the week!As our subject we have the market cross of Chichester on a busy weekend. For the long shot I have my 24 -105mm set to 105mm. I am far enough away to fill the frame although I admit to cropping a little on the sides as the subject ratio was slightly different to the camera sensor ratio.
What do we see when we examine this image? We all know that a longer lens compresses the picture. This is evident here in two prominent cases, the tower behind the cross and the people in front. You will have to take my word for it that the tower is actually some way away from the cross but you see the people in front for yourself. Look carefully at the picture and you will notice the people getting smaller as they get further away from the camera. Still the distance between the cross and the nearest person to the camera looks very close. Also take note of the verticals in this picture. All very tidy and straight up.
Now lets take a look at the second shot. This has been taken with a 17 -40 lens set to 17mm. This is the widest I can go with my lens collection. If you examine this picture closely there is a huge difference to the previous one. The tower is nowhere to be seen and a steeple has crept in from somewhere. The verticals are no longer going straight up but are converging towards the top of the structure.The whole thing has taken on a much 'heavier' feel than in the previous image, which conveys it's mediaeval delicate design much better.
Note also that we have nearly everything in focus on the latter shot whereas the first only has the cross itself sharp.
To summarise: changing the lens has affected technical issues such as depth of field and accuracy of portrayal of the verticals and dimensions of the subject. There has been a very noticeable difference to the depth of the image between the two lenses. Finally there has been a more 'artistic' difference to feel of the images where in this particular situation the wide shot seems to have increased the mass of the structure.









